Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. Armovit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1990No. Docket 110938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the denial of their motion for enforcement of garnishment against garnishee defendant. We affirm.

In September of 1986, following a jury trial, plaintiffs were awarded a total of $380,000 in damages for a malpractice claim against defendant Herminio Armovit, M.D. Plaintiffs had alleged that Dr. Armovit was negligent in prescribing diet pills to plaintiff Betty Gibbs from 1964 to 1984. Thereafter, garnishee defendant, The Medical Protective Company of Fort Wayne, Indiana, paid plaintiffs $200,000, plus costs and interest, pursuant to a medical malpractice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Medical Protective Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  3. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. LanyonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Lamotte v. Millers National Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. DeSot v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bott v. DeLandUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Medical Protective Co. of Fort WayneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. HardimanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Helmick v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API