Lecil Hander v. San Jacinto Junior College, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
For purposes of clarification we wish to explicate our earlier opinion in this case with respect to the jurisdiction of the district court. 1 The appellee Hander’s complaint was premised on the First and Fourteenth Amendments and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1970). 2 The complaint also based jurisdiction on Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 (1970). In an informal finding which is not questioned on appeal, the district court at least implicitly found jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1970). 3 We are of the opinion, and so hold, that jurisdiction in this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lecil Hander v. San Jacinto Junior College, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Henry Keith Sterzing v. Fort Bend Independent School District, Fort Bend, Texas, and Roy Kelly, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Edward R. Jagnandan v. William L. Giles, President, Mississippi State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Gay Student Services v. Texas a & M UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Patsy Goss v. San Jacinto Junior College, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Jones v. McElroyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.