In re Goldstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
On March 13, 1968, the respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the Second Judicial Department, and, in the past, he has maintained an office for the practice of law in the First Judicial Department.
Respondent does not dispute that, on February 2,1983, in the United States District Court of the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, he was convicted, by his plea of guilty, of one felony count of knowingly, willfully and unlawfully committing commodity fraud in violation of 7 USC § 23 (b) and § 13 (b) and 18 USC § 2. This crime,…
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re LangbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986