Legal Opinion

Hall v. Piedmont Publishing Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1980No. 7923SC1003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

It was plaintiff’s burden to prove defamatory language on the part of defendants of or concerning plaintiff which was published to a third person causing injury to plaintiff’s reputation and if the plaintiff was a public official or public figure, plaintiff must prove actual malice on the part of defendants. We hold that a directed verdict was properly granted for defendants because plaintiff was a public official and plaintiff has not shown actual malice on the part of defendants in the publication of any words possibly defamatory to plaintiff.

In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tyson v. L'Eggs Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Taylor v. Greensboro News Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Renwick v. News & Observer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Cochran v. Piedmont Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Renwick v. News & Observer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API