Legal Opinion
Choat v. Rome Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided August 22, 1979No. Civ. A. C77-78RPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.
This action concerns alleged infringement of U.S. Letters Patent No. 3,493,020. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338 and 1400(b). Presently pending before the Court are the following motions: defendants’ motion for reconsideration which asks for an order directing plaintiff to file an application for reissue of the patent-in-suit; plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint; defendants’ motion for a more definite statement; defendants’ motion to reopen discovery; plaintiff’s motion to compel answers to interrogatories; and defendants’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Louis W. Parker, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Motorola, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Preston G. Gaddis v. Calgon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Metro Development Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Delta Education, Inc. v. LangloisDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1989
- Towers Tenant Ass'n, Inc. v. Towers Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Johnson & Johnson, Inc. v. Wallace A. Erickson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Scarbrough v. R-Way Furniture Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
- Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.