Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hutto v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2017No. 2014-DP-00177-SCTPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE,

CONCURRING IN PART AND. DISSENTING IN PART:

In the sentencing phase of a capital murder trial, the stakes are life and death. A defendant is permitted to introduce virtually any relevant and reliable evidence torching upon the defendant’s background and character, or the crime itself, which is offered as a basis to persuade a jury to return a sentence of less than death.19

¶ 135. With the above principle in mind, this Court has stated: “We caution prosecutors and trial judges about limiting mitigation evidence offered by a defendant when it is presented fairly, and…

2Cases cited217 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Clemons v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Neal v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Stringer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ballenger v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API