Hutto v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE,
CONCURRING IN PART AND. DISSENTING IN PART:
In the sentencing phase of a capital murder trial, the stakes are life and death. A defendant is permitted to introduce virtually any relevant and reliable evidence torching upon the defendant’s background and character, or the crime itself, which is offered as a basis to persuade a jury to return a sentence of less than death.19
¶ 135. With the above principle in mind, this Court has stated: “We caution prosecutors and trial judges about limiting mitigation evidence offered by a defendant when it is presented fairly, and…
2Cases cited217 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Clemons v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Neal v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Stringer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Ballenger v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.