Legal Opinion

Groom v. Holm

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1959No. Civ. No. 18396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Appelloant prosecutes this appeal from an adverse decision in which the court found any debt of respondents owing to appellant to be barred by the statute of limitations and held respondents not to be indebted to appellant within the last four years upon an “account stated in writing,” upon a “mutual, open and current account stated in writing,” or upon an “open book account stated in writing.” The court declared that within the four years prior to the filing of the complaint appellant had not demanded of respondents any sum upon an open, current and mutual account in writing.

The major issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Rich Manufacturing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Norton v. LarcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Butler v. Bell Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Heffron v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West v. HolstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. R. E. Tharp, Inc. v. Miller Hay Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API