Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Spang

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1934No. 2421Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

The facts herein are substantially the-same as those recited in the opinion in Janosik v Spang, case No. 2381, decided this day. (18 Abs 72), and arise out of the same occurrence; this, however, being the case of the driver of the automobile.

This case, upon trial in the Common Pleas Court, also resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant.

Two errors are urged as warranting a reversal of the trial court’s judgment:

1. That there was error in the charge of the court.

2. That the verdict is manifestly against the- weight of the evidence.

A careful consideration…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Janosik v. SpangOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API