Lucas v. Spang
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By STEVENS, J.
The facts herein are substantially the-same as those recited in the opinion in Janosik v Spang, case No. 2381, decided this day. (18 Abs 72), and arise out of the same occurrence; this, however, being the case of the driver of the automobile.
This case, upon trial in the Common Pleas Court, also resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant.
Two errors are urged as warranting a reversal of the trial court’s judgment:
1. That there was error in the charge of the court.
2. That the verdict is manifestly against the- weight of the evidence.
A careful consideration…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Janosik v. SpangOhio Court of Appeals · 1934