Legal Opinion

Akana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 27, 1989No. 88-1245Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Judge.

The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, but the imposition of court costs which were assessed without notice or an opportunity to be heard are quashed. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Lester v. State, 532 So.2d 63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Singletary v. State, 530 So.2d 460 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). On remand, after proper notice and hearing, the court may reconsider the imposition of costs.

CONVICTION and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; COSTS QUASHED.

COBB and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harriel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Shipley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Singletary v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Lester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988