Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cornelius v. Benefield

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided September 3, 2013No. 2012-CA-00021-COAPublished

1DissentIrving, P.J.

¶ 35. The majority finds that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing with prejudice Cornelius’s medical-malpractice complaint against Dr. Benefield. In my opinion, the record does not support a Rule 41(b) dismissal. Therefore, I dissent. I would reverse the circuit court’s judgment and remand this case for a trial on the merits.

¶ 36. Let me be clear, I am well aware that the plaintiff shoulders the primary responsibility for moving the case forward once the complaint is filed. However, as the majority notes and then disregards, “[tjhere is no set time limit on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Days InnMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cox v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Holder v. Orange Grove Medical Specialties, P.A.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hoffman v. Paracelsus Health Care Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Barry v. ReevesMississippi Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API