Legal Opinion

Gordetsky v. Shell Eastern Petroleum Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 10, 1939No. 6731PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

The plaintiff has appealed from the action of the court below in granting defendant’s motion to strike his complaint for sham, and also from the dismissal of the action and the entry of judgment in favor of the defendant.

Plaintiff filed his complaint in an action of malicious prosecution, grounded on his arrest pursuant to complaint of defendant’s agents, and the ignoring of the bill of indictment by the grand jury.

The defendant filed a motion to strike the complaint on the ground that the same was sham, in that the defendant had probable catase. Defendant in support…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jasion Ex Rel. Jasion v. Preferred Accident Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Eisele v. RaphaelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  3. Wittemann v. GieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reynolds Metals Co. v. Metals Disintegrating Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API