Legal Opinion

Topaz Mutual Co. v. Marsh

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1992No. 21068Published

1Opinion of the Court

839 P.2d 606 (1992)

TOPAZ MUTUAL COMPANY, INC., Appellant/Cross-Respondent,

v.

Florence MARSH, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, and

Virgie Arden and the Estate of John Arden, Deceased, Cross-Respondents.

No. 21068

Supreme Court of Nevada.

September 29, 1992

Bible, Hoy, Miller, Trachok & Wadhams, Reno, for appellant/cross-respondent Topaz Mut. Co., Inc. and cross-respondent Virgie Arden.

Allison, MacKenzie, Hartman, Soumbeniotis & Russell and Mike Pavlakis, Carson City, for respondent/cross-appellant.

Gregory F. Wilson, Reno, for cross-respondent Estate of John Arden.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:[1]

Facts

Topaz Mutual…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. K Mart Corp. v. PonsockNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Unionamerica Mortgage & Equity Trust v. McDonaldNevada Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API