Legal Opinion

Belfour and Henly Heirs v. . Davis and Nixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1838Published

1Opinion of the Court

The material facts of the case were that G. Mullenex was seized of the tract of 416 acres in fee, and in 1810 contracted to sell it to Jesse Nixon, who entered and paid the purchase money, except the sum of $40, but never took a conveyance. In 1815 Stephen Henly and Andrew Belfour, who were the uncles of Jesse Nixon, and, as sureties, had paid large sums of money for him, paid that residue of the purchase (444) money to Mullenex, and he then executed the deed or instrument hereinafter mentioned, bearing date 12 June, 1815. It begins thus: "This indenture, made this, etc., between G. Mullenex,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. stephen.W. Isler v. . William Foy and F. B. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Whissenhunt v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Den on Demise of Wise v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845
  4. Maddrey v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Doe on the Demise of Foust v. TriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API