Legal Opinion

United States v. Mock

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 19, 2010No. Docket 09-4154-crPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-Appellant John Mock III appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which he filed based on the amendments to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines relating to the base offense levels for crack-related offenses, see U.S.S.G., Supp. to App. C., Amend. 706 (effective Nov. 1, 2007); see also id. Amend. 713 (effective Mar. 3, 2008) (collectively, the “crack cocaine amendments”). The district court reasoned that, because Mock was originally sentenced as a career offender, see U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, he was ineligible for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. BordenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. QuintanillaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. MalloyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
  5. United States v. LoganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API