Legal Opinion

Bird v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Marquette Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

A short statement of this case, as it is set forth in the bill, is, that Bird contracted to purchase a lot of land of Hall, and bas partly paid for it; that . he then contracted to sell the same land to McFee, who also paid for it in part and was put in possession, the balance of the purchase price not being yet due; that Hall then, in disregard of complainant’s rights, has given McFee a conveyance; that McFee is irresponsible, and complainant by this conveyance is deprived of his security for the balance which is to become due to him hereafter from McFee; and the bill prays that McFee be…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Independent Coal & Coke Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Cutler v. LovingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Lovejoy v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McManus v. FultonMontana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API