Legal Opinion

Doe v. Horne

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 20, 2024No. 4:23-cv-00185Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Helen Doe, et al., No. CV-23-00185-TUC-JGZ 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Thomas C Horne, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery as to 16 Intervenor-Defendants (Doc. 191) and Motion for a Protective Order (Doc. 196).1 Both 17 motions are fully briefed. (Doc. 191, 198, 200, 196, 199, 201.) For the following reasons, 18 the Court will grant the Motion to Compel and grant in part and deny in part the Motion 19 for Protective Order. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API