Legal Opinion

Autry v. Lawrence

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 16, 1985No. 85-44PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is a malicious prosecution case. The judge directed a verdict and granted a summary judgment to the appellee at the end of the appellant’s case for two reasons. First, he found no evidence to show a lack of probable cause and no evidence showing malice. Secondly, he found that the appellee was a Little Rock city police officer acting in his official capacity when he presented evidence to the prosecutor which resulted in the appellant’s arrest and thus the defendant was immune from this tort action under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 12-2901 (Repl. 1979). Either of these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Grimmett v. DigbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Jennings Motors v. BurchfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Crockett Motor Sales, Inc. v. LondonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Battle v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Doe v. BaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Davis v. Fulton County, Ark.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1995
  4. Greenwell v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  5. 65th Center, Inc. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API