Legal Opinion

Andrews v. McDougal

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 6, 1987No. 87-50PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is a legal malpractice case. The material facts are undisputed. The appellant engaged the appellees’ law firm, specifically James F. McDougal, to represent him in a case against his mother, who shot him on his front lawn on June 12, 1984. He was seriously injured. Andrews and his mother had a stormy relationship, and each had their version of the trouble between them. The appellant decided not to press criminal charges against his mother but to sue her civilly. McDougal told Andrews that since another partper, Vince Skillman, was representing Andrews’ father in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. NeroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Berthenia Tollett, Joined by Kelsie Tollett, Her Husband v. Austin Mashburn and Lorene Hendricks (Hendrix)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. Burson v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Boyd v. FultonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McQuay v. GuntharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. O'BRYANT v. HornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. McQuay v. GuntharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API