State v. Corey
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.
— In this ease, the State chose to proceed under Section 1936 of the 1927 Code, rather than Section 1945-al, or some other applicable'provision of the same Code.
A review of Sections 1934 to 1943 thereof, both inclusive, reveals the fact that the offense here charged necessitates: First, a consignor and consignee; second, the transportation; and third,' the lack of proper marks or labels. State v. Edwards, 205 Iowa 587, and State v. Drain, 205 Iowa 581.
However, the record before ns discloses no proof that there was a consignor or consignee for the intoxicating liquors in controversy, as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. DrainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WyattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- State v. WyattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929