Legal Opinion

Hirsovescu v. Shangri-La, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 1994No. 87C-12066; CA A77780PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from an amendment of judgment pursuant to ORCP 71B that reduced defendants’ liability to plaintiff as a result of plaintiff’s settlement with a co-defendant. He assigns error to the trial court’s decision to reduce defendants’ liability on a wrongful discharge claim by the amount that the co-defendant paid to settle multiple claims. We affirm.

Plaintiff obtained a jury verdict against Shangri-La, Inc. (the corporation) and its directors (defendants) of $30,000 for breach of contract and $10,000 for wrongful discharge. While the appeal of that judgment was pending before this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hirsovescu v. Shangri-La Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Dee Ex Rel. McDonald v. PomeroyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patton v. Carbondale Clinic, SCIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tenbusch v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API