Legal Opinion

Berry v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 29, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00890Unknown

1Opinion

UENAISTTEEDR NST DAITSTERS IDCITST ORFI CMTI SCSOOUURRTI EASTERN DIVISION TAMMY BERRY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:20-CV-890 RLW ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1 ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Tammy Berry (‘Plaintiff”) brings this action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) for judicial review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 1381, et seq. The Court has reviewed the parties’ briefs and the administrative record, including the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. Dennis W. Pearsall v. Larry Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API