Legal Opinion

State v. Broadnax

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 31, 1980No. 7353-2-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

25 Wn. App. 704 (1980)

612 P.2d 391

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v.

CLIFTON BROADNAX, JR., ET AL, Defendants, STEVEN ARTHUR THOMPSON, Appellant.

No. 7353-2-I.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

March 31, 1980.

Rebecca M. Baker, for appellant.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and J. Robin Hunt, Deputy, for respondent.

WILLIAMS, J.

Steven Arthur Thompson was charged and convicted of illegal possession of a narcotic drug, heroin. The question presented is whether the trial court was correct in ruling admissible a balloon of heroin taken from Thompson during a warrant search of a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API