Legal Opinion
Brooks v. BDO Seidman, LLP
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Schoenfeld, J.
BDO Seidman, LLP petitions this court pursuant to CPLR 7510 for a judgment confirming an arbitration award it received from the American Arbitration Association, Commercial Arbitration Tribunal (AAA) against David H. Brooks. Brooks opposes the petition and cross-moves to vacate the award pursuant to CPLR 7511. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds for BDO and confirms the award.
Background
On April 13, 2009, BDO filed a statement of claim with the AAA against Brooks for recovery of fees for accounting services. Specifically, pursuant to an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Gervant v. New England Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Rio Algom, Inc. v. Sammi Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Storey v. Searle Blatt Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- In Re the Arbitration Between Griffin Industries, Inc. & Ocean Logistics Corp. & Petrojam, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brooks v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012