Legal Opinion

Kober v. Kober

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

Defendants demurred to plaintiff’s petition, on the grounds: (1) that it did not state a cause of action pand (2) that on its face it disclosed that the alleged cause of action was barred by the Statute of Limitations. The demurrer was sustained: plaintiff declining to further plead, a judgment appropriate to that situation was duly entered. Krom such judgment plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

Tlie petition was as follows:

“Plaintiff, for her cause of action, states that she is the widow of Leopold Kober, deceased, who died on or about the 19th day of September, 1925; that she was lawfully…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Rogers v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. Armor v. FreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Burrus v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Buzick v. BuzickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Frazee v. PartneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Branner v. KlaberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Coleman v. Crescent Insulated Wire & Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. James v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Reinheimer v. RhedansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API