Stephens v. Stephens
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
Appellant sued appellees for libel. The complaint, as last amended, contained nine-counts. Appellees’ amended demurrer to the amended complaint, and to each count *45thereof, separately and severally, was sustained generally. In so ruling, the trial court did not specify which of the twenty-five grounds of the amended demurrer it considered to be good as to each of the counts. Appellant declined to plead further and, because of the ruling on the demurrer, moved for a nonsuit. The motion was granted. This appeal followed.
Motion to Dismiss Appeal
Before discussing the merits, we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Wood v. ComanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Carter v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Thomas v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Cooper v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- White v. Brookley Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- White v. Brookley Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968