Givens v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentGreene, J.
which Adkins and Battaglia, JJ., join.
I respectfully dissent.
*488The long standing rule has been that generally a jury verdict defective in form or substance should not be accepted by the trial judge. Heinze v. State, 184 Md. 613, 617, 42 A.2d 128, 130 (1945). In Heinze, this Court explained the policy behind the rule:
It is essential for the prompt and efficient administration of justice to prevent defective verdicts from being entered upon the records of the court as well as to ascertain the real intention of the jury in their finding. Where a verdict is ambiguous, inconsistent, unresponsive, or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- DeSacia v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Heinze v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.