Legal Opinion

Knox v. Kaelber

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 31, 1946No. Docket 124/566Published

1Opinion of the Court

The bill of complaint in this case was filed to enforce the specific performance of an oral argument to convey real estate and for other relief.

Mr. Knox, the complainant, in the year 1932, was a patient of Dr. Floyd M. Kaelber, the defendant. Dr. Kaelber is an osteopath with offices in New York City. Mr. Knox stated that he was suffering from "the nervous strain of working in New York" and on the recommendation of a friend called on Dr. Kaelber. He had several treatments during the year 1932 and for three or four years thereafter received regular treatments, sometimes as frequently as two and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nibert v. BaghurstNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
  2. Sumner v. SeatonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
  3. Todd v. Exeter Land Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  4. Scheck v. BowneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Schwarz v. MunsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API