Legal Opinion

City of Des Moines v. Hillis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 19, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Polle Cweiiit Court. Action to recover certain fees collected by defendant, W. G. Hillis, as'police judge of the city of Des Moines, in cases prosecuted before him for offenses against the statutes of the State. A demurrer to defendants’answer was sustained; they now appeal to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtBecic, J.

I. The defendant W. O. Nillis, as police judge of the city of Des Moines, having jurisdiction thereof under the statutes of the State, tried certain criminal cases brought before him, for which he received fees as fixed by law, amounting to the sum of $480. Of this sum $98.45 were paid by the defendants in the cases and the balance was paid him by the county. This action is brought to recover the amount of these fees, the city claiming that they should have been paid by defendant Dito its treasury, while' defendant claims that under the law he is entitled to the money. ' Thisi statement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bryan v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eckerson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Witter v. ForknerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Glaser v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Sampson v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Labour v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API