Barber v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AFTER REMAND
ONION, Presiding Judge.
On original submission appellant contended, inter alia, that the trial court erred in failing to empanel a separate jury to determine his competency to stand trial. We disposed of the other points of error and abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court to empanel a jury to determine whether appellant was competent to stand trial in 1980 when he was convicted of capital murder. Barber v. State, 737 S.W.2d 824 (Tex.Cr.App.1987).
Upon remand the trial court determined a retrospective hearing was possible and empaneled a jury which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Bauder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Turner, Albert JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.