Legal Opinion

London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. Hartman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 8, 1905Published

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. R. IX W. Holder, Judge, presiding. Heard in*.this court at the February term, 1905.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Bbesiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit brought by appellant to recover a balance claimed to be due it on an employer’s liability policy, issued by it to appellees, February 6, 1900. The evidence in the records shows that at the time the policy was issued, Frank U. Case, residing in St. Louis, Missouri, was general agent for appellant for that city, and the vicinity. Case had in his employ one E. Eeynolds Moreton, who was engaged in soliciting insurance under Case, for appellant, and at times delivered the policies and collected the premiums. A short…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phenix Insurance v. StocksIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. SchlinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Eclectic Life Insurance v. FahrenkrugIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Milwaukee Mechanics' Insurance v. SchallmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API