Legal Opinion
In re the Accounting of Murray
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 5, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, S.
In this final judicial settlement of the trustees’, accounts, one of the objectants has asked for certain information with respect to the status of corporations, the stock of which is held by the trustees. With respect to one corporation the trust owns a controlling interest, viz., 52%, while with respect to another corporation the interest is a minority one. Both corporations are national banks. No question of practice is raised with respect to the manner in which the information has been requested. At the Surrogate’s suggestion the trustees consented to furnish certain of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re the Estate of WitkindNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of SteinbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- People ex rel. Lorge v. Consolidated National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- In re the Estate of BarrettNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- Lauer v. Bayside National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Most v. First National Bank of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Rollins v. RollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Rollins v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Taylor v. Nationsbank Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997