Andrews v. Auer
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Berrien; Bridgman, J. Bill in the nature of an information by William H. Andrews, prosecuting attorney of Berrien county, on the relation of Judson Webber and another against Rupert Auer for the revocation of a liquor license. From a decree for defendant, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This cause was commenced by an information in the natur.e of a bill in equity filed by the prosecuting attorney of Berrien county, on the relation of certain property owners of the city of Niles in that county, praying for an injunction to restrain the defendant from continuing the retail liquor business in the city of Niles, and that his license be canceled and surrendered.
It appears that the defendant made the usual application under oath for a license to engage in the *246retail liquor business at 119 Main street, Niles, on March. 12, 1912, in which application it was expressly stated that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Vanderbilt v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- Klein v. Livingston ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Paulk v. Mayor of SycamoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Higgins v. License Commissioners of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Devereaux v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- George v. TravisMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Latreille v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. U. S. Realty Improvement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.