Mueller v. Mueller
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
L.R. Jones, J.S.C.
Under New Jersey’s recently amended alimony statute, a party may seek to terminate or modify his or her spousal support obligation based upon an actual or “prospective” retirement. N.J.S.A. 2A:34 — 23(j)(1)—(3). What, however, does the term, “prospective retirement” actually mean?
For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the court holds the following:
1) The amended alimony statute does not set a specific minimum or maximum time period for obtaining an advance ruling on a prospective retirement and its effect upon an existing support obligation. The spirit of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- State in the Interest of K.O., a Minor (070406)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- Kanaszka v. KunenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Cameron v. CameronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- State of New Jersey v. Armando CarreonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burris v. BurrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022