Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Mueller

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 22, 2016PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

L.R. Jones, J.S.C.

Under New Jersey’s recently amended alimony statute, a party may seek to terminate or modify his or her spousal support obligation based upon an actual or “prospective” retirement. N.J.S.A. 2A:34 — 23(j)(1)—(3). What, however, does the term, “prospective retirement” actually mean?

For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the court holds the following:

1) The amended alimony statute does not set a specific minimum or maximum time period for obtaining an advance ruling on a prospective retirement and its effect upon an existing support obligation. The spirit of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. State in the Interest of K.O., a Minor (070406)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  3. Kanaszka v. KunenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  4. Cameron v. CameronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  5. State of New Jersey v. Armando CarreonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burris v. BurrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API