Legal Opinion

People v. Barbour

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided June 25, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosalsky, J.

The defendant raises four objections to the validity of the indictment charging him with the crime of perjury. Only two merit any consideration: that his constitutional rights were violated in that he was compelled to be a witness against himself in the giving of his testimony before the grand jury; and that illegal testimony was admitted before the grand jury.

The charge of perjury is predicated upon the false testimony alleged to have been given by the defendant against Rita Martini and Fred D. Kaplan, her attorney, before the grand jury which was investigating a charge of attempted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GilletteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Hope v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. People v. BermelNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. WillisNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. FarrellNew York Court of Special Session · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ApaoHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. ScotlandHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. Calandrillo, New York County Courts1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API