Legal Opinion

John Diebold & Sons' Stone Co. v. Tatterson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1914PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the city of Norfolk. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

John Diebold & Sons’ Stone Company, Incorporated, presented its petition to this court, in which it is alleged that it has been aggrieved by the decree of the circuit court of the city of Norfolk in a certain chancery suit therein pending, wherein the petitioner was plaintiff and Lizzie M. Tatterson, executrix of the last will and testament of E. Tatterson, deceased, and others were defendants.

The petitioner was a sub-contractor under Tatterson, general contractor, to furnish stone and stone work to be used in a church building in the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shipman v. FletcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Clement v. Adams Bros.-Paynes Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  3. Taylor v. Sutherlin-Meade Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  4. Merriman Co. v. Thomas & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. Phillips v. AnthonySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Potts v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  2. H. N. Francis & Co. v. Hotel Rueger, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. Coleman v. PearmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  4. People v. MarquisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. In Re TerryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API