Legal Opinion

Kliewer ex rel. Kliewer v. Sopata

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 3, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 92-B-959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings, contending that plaintiff’s state *1570law claims are barred by the statute of limitations, C.R.S. § 13-80-103(l)(c). The issue is adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially aid its resolution. Because plaintiff did not file this action within one year after her claim accrued, defendant’s motion is granted and the state law claims are dismissed.

Plaintiffs allege the following facts in their complaint. Defendant Steven Sopata was an Aurora police officer assigned to the K-9 division, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cain v. GuzmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Podboy v. Fraternal Order of PoliceColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Archer v. CookDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  3. Podboy v. Fraternal Order of Police, Denver Sheriff Lodge 27Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API