Chesbrough v. The New York & Erie Railroad
New York Supreme Court
MOTION to strike out certain parts of the complaint, as irrelevant and redundant, and as to other portions of the complaint, that they he made definite and certain.
1Opinion of the CourtPeabody, J.
The plaintiff in his complaint alleges, that on the 8th of May, 1841, an agreement was made between him and his associates on one side, and the defendants on the other side, and was reduced to writing and signed; which provided, in substance that a contract, to the effect therein particularly stated, for the construction of about fifty miles of the defendants’ road, should be entered into between the parties thereto, as soon as the same, together with the requisite plans and specifications, could be prepared. A copy of this agreement is set forth in the complaint, which states, with some…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Potts v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Yoe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019