Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold Eugene Manning

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1971No. 28805_1PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYER, Circuit Judge:

Manning was found guilty of robbing a Keystone Heights, Florida, bank in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a). 1 Urging us to reverse, Manning’s principal arguments are that the court below improperly admitted, over his objection, evidence establishing that he was in possession of a large amount of cash immediately after the bank robbery; that the court should have excluded an airplane ticket, taken from his car during a warrantless search; and that because of prejudicial newspaper publicity, the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial. We affirm.

Tak…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. ArmocidaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Oscar E. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Fred Louis Bell and Charles Lavern BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API