Legal Opinion

Boneno v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1981No. 8110SC266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

As their first assignment of error, plaintiffs argue that G.S. 143-28.1 violates Article III, § 5(3) of the North Carolina Constitution which provides for a balanced budget. We disagree.

The provision to which plaintiffs refer provides that the Governor shall not, in administering the budget, permit a deficit to be incurred by the State on account of total expenditures exceeding total receipts. Plaintiffs apparently argue that the incurring of a contractual obligation constitutes an expenditure within the meaning of this provision. We hold, however, that an expenditure occurs…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Bond Com'n v. ALL TAXPAYERSSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. County of Cabarrus v. TolsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API