Boneno v. State
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
As their first assignment of error, plaintiffs argue that G.S. 143-28.1 violates Article III, § 5(3) of the North Carolina Constitution which provides for a balanced budget. We disagree.
The provision to which plaintiffs refer provides that the Governor shall not, in administering the budget, permit a deficit to be incurred by the State on account of total expenditures exceeding total receipts. Plaintiffs apparently argue that the incurring of a contractual obligation constitutes an expenditure within the meaning of this provision. We hold, however, that an expenditure occurs…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State Bond Com'n v. ALL TAXPAYERSSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- County of Cabarrus v. TolsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005