Rosado v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
Neftali Rosado has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review declaring him to be ineligible for benefits because he was discharged from his employment for his willful misconduct.1 Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802 (e).
Mr. Rosado was employed as a rat control worker by the City of Philadelphia. On December 8, 1977, he submitted a written request for a 30-day personal leave of absence, effective December 16, 1978, so that he could visit…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Richardson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Ryman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982