Legal Opinion

Rosado v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1807 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Neftali Rosado has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review declaring him to be ineligible for benefits because he was discharged from his employment for his willful misconduct.1 Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802 (e).

Mr. Rosado was employed as a rat control worker by the City of Philadelphia. On December 8, 1977, he submitted a written request for a 30-day personal leave of absence, effective December 16, 1978, so that he could visit…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Ryman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API