Legal Opinion

Porier v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1984No. 67344PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for burglary of a vehicle. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at life.

Appellant was convicted of breaking and entering an automobile owned by Marie Philyaw, with intent to commit theft and without the effective consent of the owner. A previous conviction and sentence of life in this cause were reversed by this Court for failure to prove the allegations in the first enhancement paragraph. Porier v. State, 591 S.W.2d 482 (Tex.Cr.App.1980).

Appellant challenges the admission…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API