Legal Opinion

Ferro v. Society of Saint Pius X

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2006No. 31807PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding a parishioner damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress because of a priest’s conduct. The statute of limitations had run before the lawsuit was filed, but the jury found that the defendants were equitably estopped from asserting it as a defense. Because the plaintiff did not proceed with due diligence once he knew or reasonably should have known that the alleged misrepresentations supporting the equitable estoppel were untrue, we reverse the judgment.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The plaintiff-appellant Anthony…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J.R. Simplot Co. v. Chemetics International, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Maroun v. Wyreless Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Anderson v. Anderson, Kaufman, Ringert & Clark, CharteredIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Knudsen v. AgeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of McCall v. BuxtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Winn v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Gregory v. StallingsIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Nicholas Hull v. North Lincoln Hospital District, Dba Star Valley Health; Todd Haderlie, M.D.; Christian M. Morgan, M.D.; Denise Allred, Rn; Myka Hillstead, Rn; Deanna Starcer, Rn; and Ashley Thornock, RnWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Gallagher v. Best Western Cottontree InnIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API