Citizens State Bank v. Moebeck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the- district, court for Clay county to recover $427.56 for conversion of grain. Ole Holt filed his complaint in intervention. The facts are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Action in the- district, court for Clay county to recover $427.56 for conversion of grain. Ole Holt filed his complaint in intervention. The facts are stated in the opinion. The ease >was tried before Dancer, J., who at the close of the testimony denied plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict, and a jury which answered in the affirmative the question: “Was the contract for deed obtained by M. E. Dahl and H. H. Dahl from the intervener by fraud?” and in the negative the question: “Is the plaintiff a bona fide holder of the promissory note described in the complaint?” and returned a verdict…
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
This is an action to recover the value of certain grain alleged to have been converted by the defendant to his own use and to which plaintiff claims title and the right of possession under a certain chattel mortgage executed by the intervener on August 25, 1913. A verdict and special findings were returned by the jury in favor of both the defendant and intervener. Upon a motion the trial court, notwithstanding the verdict, ordered judgment for the plaintiff, and against the defendant for the sum of $414, and against both defendant and intervener for the costs and disbursements. Judgment was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Warren v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Clark v. Gaar, Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brees v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922