Legal Opinion

Castetter v. Township

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2011No. 49A05-1105-PL-249PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-plaintiffs Jeff Castetter (“Cas-tetter”), Tony Jones, David Strode, and Matthew Hickey 1 (collectively, “the Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment and its grant of appellee-defendant Lawrence Township’s (“Lawrence”) motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Issues

The parties raise several issues for our review, which we restate, reorder, and consolidate into the following two issues:

I. Whether the appeal is moot; and

II. Whether the trial court erred when it denied the Appellants’ motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Cavens v. ZaberdacIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Shira v. State ex rel. HamIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Markley Enterprises, Inc. v. GroverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robert Fechtman, as Guardian of the Estate of Roberto Hernandez v. United States Steel Corporation, Zurich North AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Alfonso M. Aguayo and William O'Connor v. City of Hammond Inspection DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Covered Bridge Homeowners Association, Inc., Clark County, Indiana Commission v. Town of Sellersburg, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Machalk v. Cedar Lake, Indiana Town ofDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API