Wells v. Zadeck
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.*
I,We granted this writ application to consider whether the doctrine of contra non valentem applies to suspend the ten year liberative prescriptive period applicable to an action by the mineral interest owners against the operator of a unit well who has failed to pay the owners their share of proceeds for mineral production. Wells v. Zadeck, 11-1232 (La.10/12/11), 74 So.3d 212.
For the reasons that follow, we conclude the doctrine of contra non valentem applies to suspend the running of prescription because the mineral interest owners did not know nor reasonably should they…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Campo v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NOSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- Quinn v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Butler v. Denka Performance ElastomerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Felix v. Safeway Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Scott v. ZaheriLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.