Legal Opinion
Albert E. Lanier v. Michael Fair, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 1, 1989No. 88-2046PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FUSTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Albert E. Lanier filed this action under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 alleging that his due process rights were violated by his removal from a halfway house program and by the rescission of his previously established “reserve parole date.” The case was submitted to the district court on cross motions for summary judgment, whereupon defendants' motion was granted and appellant’s was denied. At the district court level appellant sought declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as monetary damages. Prior to oral argument appellant withdrew his claim for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Victory v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- James Dominique v. William WeldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Guy L. Smith, Jr. v. Massachusetts Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Stephen Gerard Rodi v. Donald R. VentetuoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Frank Hoffman, Etc. v. City of Warwick, Renauld Langlois, Etc. v. City of East ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.