Legal Opinion

Charles W. Hancock v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, and William McCauley Director, United States Employees' Compensation Commission

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 6, 1956No. 11809PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the dismissal of his complaint by the district court for the district of New Jersey. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff, a civilian employee of the United States who had contracted a chronic disease in government service, had been denied compensation under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. A. § 751 et seq. by the Director of the Bureau of Employees' Compensation or its predecessor, the Employees’ Compensation Commission, and by the Secretary of Labor. The complaint was filed pro se and it is difficult to determine exactly what…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Calderon v. Tobin, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Edith Blanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. John Soderman v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. HayesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1966
  5. David Bessel v. C. J. Clyde, George D. Simms and Thomas K. Dunstan, in Their Capacity as Panel Members of Eastern Industrial Personnel Security BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API