Legal Opinion

Charles Skinner v. . D. G. Maxwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1872PublishedCited by 32 opinions

This was a motion for an injunction and the appointment of a receiver heard before Logan, Judge, at Fall Term 1871, of Mecklenburg Superior Court. The facts of the case, upon which the judgment of the court is rendered are fully stated in the opinion of the Court. Erom the order of injunction and the appointment of a receiver, the defendant appealed, to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Dirac, J".

The plaintiff purchased a stock of goods from the defendant for the purpose of carrying on the business of trade and merchandise. He paid a certain amount in cash and executed a note for the balance of the purchase money which he secured by a mortgage on the stock of goods. After this purchase the plaintiff bought other goods, which in the course of his business, were placed in the store with the stock which he bad received from the defendant.

The day of redemption, specified in the mortgage, having passed without payment, the defendant as mortgagee, took possession of all the goods…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rittenhouse's Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1847

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Chandler v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Greensboro Morris Plan Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Blades v. Hood Ex Rel. Savings Bank & Trust Co. of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Lambeth v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API