Eardman v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. Employee Welfare Benefit Plans
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*198MEMORANDUM and ORDER
ELFVIN, District Judge.
In this action arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., alleging inter alia a violation of the terms of an employee welfare benefit plan,1 a hearing for the presentation of evidence pertinent to the construction of certain provisions of such plan’s documents upon which plaintiffs’ first cause of action is premised was held July 18th through 26th.2 In an Order filed June 22, 1984 I had denied both parties’ motions for partial summary judgment concerning plaintiffs’ initial claim inasmuch as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Bower v. Bunker Hill Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Myron v. Trust Co. Bank Long Term Disability Benefit PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re White Farm Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Alday v. Container Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Henne v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
- Webb v. GAF Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Rinard v. Eastern Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.