Legal Opinion

Jones v. Natesha

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 12, 2001No. 00 C 4499PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

Currently before the court are defendants Dr. R.K. Natesha’s and Dr. Sood’s motions to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”). For the following reasons, the court denies both motions. 1

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Brian Jones (“Jones”), an inmate at Stateville Correctional Center, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”) against individual Stateville Correctional Center and Joliet Correctional Center medical personnel. The amended complaint alleges the following…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. NateshaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API